A plain and simple reason to hate George W. Bush and the rich white men who run this country.
I was up Tuesday morning early with my son Carter so my wife could get some sleep since she had been watching him all weekend alone. I flipped on the TV, set Carter down and put some toys out on the floor for him to play with. HBO was the channel that was left on. They were playing the weeks prior “Real Sports”.
The segment they were running was about how children athletes on the East Coast in this one particular area had an asthma rate that was significantly higher than the national average. I don’t recall the exact figures, but it was staggering. (Something like 20%) The question was why? Basically there are a triangle of 3 coal power plants that dump literally tons of particulate matter into the air in this area. OK. Is it preventable?
Back in 1970 Tricky Dick signed the Clean Air Act Amendment, part of which stated all new coal fired power plants needed to install millions of dollars worth of “scrubbers” that would drop these emissions levels to far less harmful amounts. It was called New Source Review.
Time passed and a few power companied thought they could just say fuck you to the EPA and built new power plants that didn’t have the scrubbers. Clinton takes office with a renewed sense of environmental conciseness and the EPA begins to prosecute a few of these companies. The law takes time to move, and these power companies begin to, instead of clean up their plants, give millions of dollars to the Republican candidacy of George W. Bush.
What does GWB do when he gets into office? The remaining lawsuits get “stalled” in court. New Source Review get rewritten to say that you can spend 20% of the value of an old power plant to “upgrade” it and still not have to meet emissions levels. Old plants weren’t considered because they typically only have a 20-30 year life span and then have to be rebuilt. 20% of a billion dollar asset is… well do the math. You can have 5 refurbishment upgrades done to your plant and bam! Brand new power plant with no emissions control. You saved yourself the millions of dollars on emissions controls.
Kids are getting asthma. People are dying from these particulate levels. What the fuck?
This makes me so mad.
Please, Bush lovers and Republicans explain this away.
If we can’t burn coal freely the terrorists win, right? Or should I not question a wartime president’s motives? Maybe the research is inconclusive, or misleading. This population of children was somehow manipulated by hippies and environmentalists, right? Steve…. Nick… Chris… anyone?
I set aside the hundreds of other reasons I don’t like our current president, and this is an outrage. Making rich men richer at the expense of public health is disgraceful.
Synopsis from hbo.com
The Air We Breathe
For many children growing up in the shadow of coal-fired power plants, athletic participation is contingent on the state of their asthma and their ability to deal with pollutants generated by the plants. In towns across the eastern United States, power plants lacking adequate pollution controls are spewing emissions - recorded at 15 million tons a year nationwide - that travel into the lungs of little leaguers and soccer players alike. Scientists believe the toxins inhaled by children while playing sports are especially dangerous to young athletes for three reasons: their lungs are still maturing; their immune system is still developing; and the higher rate of inhalation during athletic activity brings more pollutants into their respiratory system. In a two-part expose, correspondent Jon Frankel explores power companies' resistance to the government's call to curb pollution, speaking with two former Environmental Protection Agency investigators and former EPA head Christine Whitman on why federal laws seem to have been laxly enforced and why the application of pollution controls has not been a top priority. But the findings are not simply a matter of coal-powered plants failing to meet environmental codes. The story goes deeper, connecting wealthy business executives and their sizable political endorsements, leading all the way to Washington. This REAL SPORTS/Sports Illustrated collaboration investigates the unsettling reality facing communities where the health of their youngsters is being compromised.
Labels: Politics
10 Comments:
Don't look at me. I'm a proponent of nuclear energy.
By Nick, at 1:02 PM, July 05, 2006
It's much too complicated. I suggest we just ignore it.
By Chris, at 1:05 PM, July 05, 2006
Uhhh... Tricky Dick, assuming you are speaking of Richard Nixon was not President in 1977...
But gee... I don't know... During hell week when I played football they decided to burn the field next to the school for whatever reason, probably arson and we still had to freaking run. I think I coughed up blood. I also was forced to swim in a pool with a lightning storm.
You live, you learn... The problem was there before Bush and will probably be there after the next Bush is elected in 2008.
By Steve, at 6:38 PM, July 05, 2006
Man, you get fat fingers and type 1977 instead of 1970 and you’re crucified.
Anyway, wow. Great responses guys. Steve always likes to retort on his blog about “typical liberal” responses. Well these are “typical conservative” responses. It’s not my problem. It’s too complex. It’s been there forever. Why should we deal with it now?
Are you going to tell that to all those children who can’t breath at night, or think they’re going to die while there having an asthma attack? Or who do die as a result of a respiratory disease?
Tell them, hey Timmy, sucks for you, better luck next reincarnation. (or it’ll be better in heaven, just tough it out now) My buddy who owns the local power plant didn’t want to pay extra money so you wouldn’t have to suffer so much, but he really wanted that new personal helicopter.
By lawryde, at 8:14 AM, July 06, 2006
What do you want bro, a pledge to vote Democrat and a solemn swear to boycott energy companies?
I don't know what the answer is. Maybe it's the locals standing up and saying enough is enough. Maybe it's a few more lawsuits. I don't know.
I just refuse to buy into the notion that the solution for all the world's problems is to hate George Bush. There's 500+ crooked politicians in DC and in every other city taking the same crooked contributions, making the same crooked regulations, etc...
To make an issue like this just a liberal/conservative issue, as if because someone votes Republican they want kids to have asthma, smacks of a bit of ignorance IMO.
By Nick, at 9:55 AM, July 06, 2006
I’m not saying if you vote Republican that you’re OK with kids getting asthma.
I’m saying look at what the man many of you’ve put up on a pedestal has done. This is one situation. How many more are there? He’s put big business ahead of the average man. He doesn’t care about the common man. He cares about his rich friends.
I agree that there are hundreds of corrupt politicians out there. Obviously there are Democrats out there that are dirty too. I’m personally on the way to becoming an Anarchist. I think I’ll write a post about that later. Anyway, I think the president should be held to some sort of higher standard. If we can spend all kinds of taxpayer money to investigate a BJ, lets start looking into this corrupt bastards dealings.
By lawryde, at 10:46 AM, July 06, 2006
I don't put anyone on a pedestal. I voted for Bush for simple reasons. Lower taxes and I want to be able to invest as much as my Social Security as I can. I also thought we'd have less spending by now, but neither him nor Congress can figure that one out.
Just because you support(ed) someone for President, doesn't mean you support or approve of everything they do.
By Nick, at 11:44 AM, July 06, 2006
Lawryde, why do you hate America?
/conservative
By E, at 12:02 PM, July 06, 2006
Erica,
The question rather...
Why do you hate freedom?
Cheer up lawryde, you'd be proud of me. With the flack I have gotten over my Hummer by that hippy chick in Sacto a few weeks back and my refusal to see "An Inconvenient Truth" solely because it is attached to Al Gore, I decided to host a Global Warming Information party coinciding with the Discovery Channel's Special with Tom Brokaw at my house in two weeks because I feel the issue is important that it is not made to be so political like we do. We are both part of the problem because I won't see something because of Gore and you bring up Bush, who's time is limited in the White House and we're all lucky he isn't absolute leader like Kim Jung Il (Remember it was Clinton who gave him nuke technology for "energy", yet, Democrats fight tooth and nail in this country against Nuclear energy because of the "waste" associated with it)
Is all that a better answer or do you want more. You are not a typical liberal by the way, they hang out on Kos like it's prophecy.
By Steve, at 8:19 PM, July 06, 2006
What needs to be done is to find a clean energy source which there isn't one taht any company wants to invest in (wind power?). Nuclear power has it's benefits but it also produces radioactive waste which no one has figured out what to do with. Yucca Mountain has been in the works for how many years, 20? Then after some place is found to put the nuclear waste kids in the area will be getting tons of tumors. Then you can blame the president who is in office at that time. It is much more complicated than just blaming it on the person in power. Blame it on the person who doesn't want a nuclear plant in their backyard so we have to keep using the old coal plants. Blame it on the companies that don't want to build a new, more environmentally friendly coal plant. Blame it on the citizens who don't want the wind farms in their backyard...
By Anonymous, at 1:26 PM, July 07, 2006
Post a Comment
<< Home